When I was still squeaky new at the reporter job I’m still doing, a guy from the forest industry came into my office to talk to me. He had charts and all sorts of facts and information and wanted me to write an article about how great the forest industry is. I figured I’d give him his say, even though I’ve always been a ‘tree hugger’ myself. After all, we are supposedly writing an unbiased paper. He pointed out the various ways in which trees are harvested, and explained selective cutting methods and the fact that he believed clear-cutting was the best method for forest health.
He talked at me for four hours. I probably should’ve kicked him out long before then, but I was inexperienced, and still am. When the article came out, I had a few of the facts wrong – nothing major, but he wanted me to write a correction, which I did. The next week, a man who thinks like I always have, wrote a very well-written letter to the editor which we printed. It was against the forestry practices we use in our area, and explains why.
In the meantime we printed a bunch of letters from folks in a nearby area who want to stop logging in an old-growth forest. They are especially concerned with the pine mushrooms they pick. Many of these folks depend on the mushrooms to augment their meager incomes. Some elderly Native people go to this spot to pick because it’s accessible, now that they’ve got mobility problems. The letter we printed which was a response to the forestry article was in support of their efforts to stop logging practices there.
When the paper came out the forestry guy flipped. He wrote a long letter, insulting the guy who pointed out that his practices were wrong. He said the man was living in a dream world, and that logging was the great hope of the future for our area – a view I disagree with entirely. He left this letter on my chair. He e-mailed this letter to my publisher. He called me at home and left a message on my answering machine about this letter. If it were my call, I’d have lost the damn thing. I disagree in the first place, and that guy was really pissing me off.
So the editor, who’s been off with a back injury, is now back on the job. She knows this guy, and has made the call to publish the letter, but has edited it to take out the insulting bits. I can see her point. We shouldn’t be publishing stuff that we agree with and ‘losing’ stuff we don’t. We’re supposed to be a paper which appeals to everyone in this area, not just the people we agree with, but DAMN! I’d love to write something to slam this guy.
I am not ‘out’ as a Witch at this job. Didn’t seem like the best idea, given that it’s a small town and there’s nine churches here. It isn’t that I’m scared anyone will find out or any of that – just hasn’t come up. I don’t care if they find out by some other method. I am who I am. Besides, they publish things they probably disagree with religiously too – it really shouldn’t be personal. Yet as a Pagan, it’s tough to separate out the things I disagree with, not commenting on them. I’d like to join up with the folks protesting the cutting down of that forest, but there’s a geography problem that goes with time limitations. But I’ve put everything they’ve sent me into the paper while I had a say. I no longer have that say, since the editor is back.
While I did, we’ve had complaints that the paper has become “too Native” in content. That’s the best compliment I think I’ve had so far. I think there’s still a gulf in understanding between Native and non-Native residents here. By publishing more Native content, I’d hoped to fill that gap – a little anyway.
I suppose it’s really something I still have a job there, since the woman I was replacing is back. I’m guessing it will last until the end of the summer. I didn’t want that because my garden is suffering. But I will keep with it as long as I can, and as long as they want me. I hope it will be a spring-board to something else for me. At least I know I don’t want to be a journalist. Not that it’s a real option for me at my age anyway, except here in town.